The fair use law is the most confusing to me. According to the fair use law for education uses, I can make copies of copyrighted work, embed copyrighted material into new work that I create, and share, sell, and distribute said copies of my new work. How is that different that what I was already doing with my free-for-all attitude? That's where the law becomes muddled to me. Of course I wouldn't intentionally use copyrighted information illegally. My intentions are always to inform my students using engaging materials.
I now understand that even though I cited my sources, that act alone doesn't make information I used fall within the copyright and fair use laws. I realize that I have to use critical thinking skills to determine if fair use applies to what I want to use. However, I don't want to make a 180 and be scared to use information because I'm afraid to make a determination of the legality of it's use. I believe there is a fine line that needs to followed and respected. Understanding copyright, tranformativeness, and fair use are not something I am going to completely understand after reading one book. This is a skill that I am going to have to work with on a daily basis when using the Internet to find information.
I thought it was really ironic how "giving credit" through a citation was almost like admitting to copyright infringement. I know now that it's better to use something while making sure it would be considered Fair Use rather then just adding a citation to "cover my bases."
ReplyDeleteYeah, that's the bit that surprised me the most too. Proper citations are a HUUUUGE part of 5th grade. Not just information, but image and media citations as well...
DeleteI'm guilty too! I thought I was covered under the special teacher "blanket". It wasn't until we read Copyright Clarity and discussed it in class that I felt more confident. But I think that the reason it seems confusing is because we have so much more free rein with Fair Use and how we justify what we use.
ReplyDelete